Skip to content →

Facilitated Communication – Recommended Readings and Resources

Despite the overwhelming evidence against its effectiveness, facilitated communication continues to be used and marketed as a legitimate treatment for autism.

This page is meant to function as a growing list of resources to help inform parents, instructors, students, and practicioners about the dangers of facilitated communication.

Position Statements

Statement on Facilitated Communication by the American Psychological Association

Statement on Facilitated Communication by the American Speech-Language and Hearing Association

Statement on Facilitated Communication by the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication

Compilation of Position Statements courtesy of the Behavior Analysis Association of Michigan

News Articles

The Strange Case of Anna Stubblefield – NY Times article by Daniel Engber

Apple’s Autism Ad of Magical Thinking – Article by Jules Montague

Why Communication from a ‘Locked-in’ Child is a Miracle We Must Question – Article by Christopher French and Michael Marshall

Why a Controversial Method for Autism Communication Hasn’t Disappeared – Article by James Elliott

Daughter of Wolsingham Man Kept in Secure Unit for 6 Months Following False Abuse Allegations – Article published in the Northern Echo

Journal Articles

Stolen Voices: Facilitated Communication is an Abuse of Human Rights – Article by Jeff Chan and Karen Nankervis

Facilitated Communication Denies People With Disabilities Their Voice  – Article by Jason Travers, Matt Tincani, and Russ Lang

Journalism Gone Awry

Unfortunately, many journalists have not done their due-diligence to understand facilitated communication and the lack of research supporting it. Instead, journalists have sensationalized facilitated communication and passed it off as a miracle cure. Or, journalists pass facilitated communication off as “controversial” and present both sides, as if there are two sides to present. The following articles serve as examples of how uninformed journalism can spread false information about facilitated communication.

Boy Starts Inspirational Blog After Years of Silence

Is Shakira Really Communicating?

Facilitated Communication and Autism

Non-speaking Man with Autism Co-produces Film to Promote Inclusion

Judicial Oversight Gone Awry

Court May Consider Facilitated Communication – An Indiana court ruled to allow an individual to use facilitated communication as testimony, despite the overwhelming evidence that suggests it is the facilitator, not the individual, who is communicating.

Recommended Videos